Israel vs Samoa: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Israel
0 ha per person
in 2024
Samoa
0 ha per person
in 2024
Israel rank
113th
Samoa rank
113th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Israel
- Samoa
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Samoa, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 113th and Samoa ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Israel |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Israel |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Israel |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Israel or Samoa?
- Israel, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Israel and Samoa?
- 0 ha per person, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Samoa?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Samoa rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Israel ranks 113th and Samoa ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.