Libya vs Mauritius: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Libya
0 ha per person
in 2024
Mauritius
0 ha per person
in 2024
Libya rank
113th
Mauritius rank
113th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Libya
- Mauritius
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 113th and Mauritius ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Libya or Mauritius?
- Libya, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Libya and Mauritius?
- 0 ha per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Mauritius rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Libya ranks 113th and Mauritius ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.