Mauritius vs Norway: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Mauritius
0 ha per person
in 2024
Norway
0 ha per person
in 2024
Mauritius rank
113th
Norway rank
113th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Mauritius
- Norway
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Norway, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
Mauritius ranks 113th and Norway ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Norway |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Mauritius or Norway?
- Mauritius, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Mauritius and Norway?
- 0 ha per person, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Mauritius ranks 113th and Norway ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.