Australia vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

Australia
0.6546 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.5474 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
34th
Zimbabwe rank
35th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • Australia
  • Zimbabwe
0246810199020062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.6546 ha per square kilometre against 0.5474 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1072 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Australia ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 188 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1.42 ha per square kilometre 4.84 ha per square kilometre 3.43 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.8966 ha per square kilometre 1.52 ha per square kilometre 0.6281 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.6636 ha per square kilometre 1.23 ha per square kilometre 0.5642 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.4724 ha per square kilometre 0.4902 ha per square kilometre 0.0178 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, Australia or Zimbabwe?
Australia, at 0.6546 ha per square kilometre against 0.5474 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between Australia and Zimbabwe?
0.1072 ha per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/australia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/australia/zimbabwe/">Australia vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.