Bangladesh vs Costa Rica: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

Bangladesh
0.0906 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.0829 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
59th
Costa Rica rank
60th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Costa Rica
00.20.40.6199020062023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0.0906 ha per square kilometre against 0.0829 ha per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0077 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 59th and Costa Rica ranks 60th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1329 ha per square kilometre 0.1676 ha per square kilometre 0.0347 ha per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.2851 ha per square kilometre 0.1946 ha per square kilometre 0.0905 ha per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 0.1883 ha per square kilometre 0.2738 ha per square kilometre 0.0855 ha per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.2185 ha per square kilometre 0.1892 ha per square kilometre 0.0294 ha per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Costa Rica?
Bangladesh, at 0.0906 ha per square kilometre against 0.0829 ha per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Costa Rica?
0.0077 ha per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Costa Rica?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Costa Rica rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 59th and Costa Rica ranks 60th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Costa Rica: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/costa-rica/">Bangladesh vs Costa Rica: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.