Belarus vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

Belarus
0.0003 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0003 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
102nd
New Zealand rank
101st

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • Belarus
  • New Zealand
00.10.20.30.40.5199020062023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0003 ha per square kilometre against 0.0003 ha per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 101st of 188 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0391 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre 0.0386 ha per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.1104 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre 0.1098 ha per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0824 ha per square kilometre 0.0015 ha per square kilometre 0.0808 ha per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0419 ha per square kilometre 0.0019 ha per square kilometre 0.04 ha per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, Belarus or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.0003 ha per square kilometre against 0.0003 ha per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between Belarus and New Zealand?
0 ha per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 101st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/belarus/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/belarus/new-zealand/">Belarus vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.