China vs Sao Tome and Principe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

China
0.0295 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0223 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
77th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
79th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • China
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.050.10.15199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0295 ha per square kilometre against 0.0223 ha per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0072 ha per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.

China ranks 77th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 79th of 188 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0285 ha per square kilometre 0.0009 ha per square kilometre 0.0275 ha per square kilometre China
2000s 0.0624 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0624 ha per square kilometre China
2010s 0.0347 ha per square kilometre 0.0022 ha per square kilometre 0.0325 ha per square kilometre China
2020s 0.0187 ha per square kilometre 0.0056 ha per square kilometre 0.0132 ha per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, China or Sao Tome and Principe?
China, at 0.0295 ha per square kilometre against 0.0223 ha per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between China and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0072 ha per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sao Tome and Principe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
China ranks 77th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 79th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sao Tome and Principe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/china/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/china/sao-tome-and-principe/">China vs Sao Tome and Principe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.