Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

Kazakhstan
0.0003 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0003 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
103rd
Namibia rank
105th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Namibia
01234199020062023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0003 ha per square kilometre against 0.0003 ha per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 105th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0213 ha per square kilometre 2.28 ha per square kilometre 2.26 ha per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0081 ha per square kilometre 0.41 ha per square kilometre 0.4019 ha per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0024 ha per square kilometre 0.0015 ha per square kilometre 0.001 ha per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0.0074 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 ha per square kilometre 0.0072 ha per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
Kazakhstan, at 0.0003 ha per square kilometre against 0.0003 ha per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
0 ha per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 105th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/namibia/">Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.