Lithuania vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

Lithuania
0.0007 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0003 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
98th
New Zealand rank
101st

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • Lithuania
  • New Zealand
00.020.040.06199020062023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.0007 ha per square kilometre against 0.0003 ha per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0004 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 2.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 98th and New Zealand ranks 101st of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0031 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre 0.0026 ha per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 0.0161 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre 0.0155 ha per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 0.0018 ha per square kilometre 0.0015 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 ha per square kilometre Lithuania
2020s 0.0009 ha per square kilometre 0.0019 ha per square kilometre 0.001 ha per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, Lithuania or New Zealand?
Lithuania, at 0.0007 ha per square kilometre against 0.0003 ha per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between Lithuania and New Zealand?
0.0004 ha per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and New Zealand?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and New Zealand rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 98th and New Zealand ranks 101st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/new-zealand/">Lithuania vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.