Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

Samoa
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa rank
109th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
109th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • Samoa
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.050.10.15199020062023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 ha per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Samoa ranks 109th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 109th of 188 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0008 ha per square kilometre 0.0083 ha per square kilometre 0.0075 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0167 ha per square kilometre 0.0167 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre —
2020s 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, Samoa or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Samoa, at 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 ha per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
Samoa ranks 109th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/samoa/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/samoa/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.