Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

Thailand
0.6563 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.5474 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
35th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • Thailand
  • Zimbabwe
0246810199020062023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 0.6563 ha per square kilometre against 0.5474 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1089 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Thailand ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 188 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Thailand Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6643 ha per square kilometre 4.84 ha per square kilometre 4.18 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.8229 ha per square kilometre 1.52 ha per square kilometre 0.7019 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.6801 ha per square kilometre 1.23 ha per square kilometre 0.5477 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.4469 ha per square kilometre 0.4902 ha per square kilometre 0.0432 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, Thailand or Zimbabwe?
Thailand, at 0.6563 ha per square kilometre against 0.5474 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between Thailand and Zimbabwe?
0.1089 ha per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Thailand and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
Thailand ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/thailand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/thailand/zimbabwe/">Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.