What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?

0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?

33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP)

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

66th

Chile rank

68th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chile

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 66th and Chile ranks 68th of 185 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Chile	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chile?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?: 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 66th and Chile ranks 68th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/chile/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Unit: ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.