Eritrea vs Grenada: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP)
Eritrea
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Grenada
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
112th
Grenada rank
112th
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) over time
- Eritrea
- Grenada
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Grenada, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 112th and Grenada ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Grenada?
- Eritrea, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Grenada as of 2011.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Grenada?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Grenada?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Grenada rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 112th and Grenada ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.