Kenya vs Serbia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP)
Kenya
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kenya rank
61st
Serbia rank
63rd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) over time
- Kenya
- Serbia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.5 times Serbia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kenya |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Kenya or Serbia?
- Kenya, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Kenya and Serbia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Serbia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Kenya ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.