What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Namibia and New Zealand?

0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and New Zealand?

35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Namibia vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP)

Namibia

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

New Zealand

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Namibia rank

95th

New Zealand rank

97th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) over time

Namibia
New Zealand

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in New Zealand, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 95th and New Zealand ranks 97th of 185 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Namibia	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0004 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0.0004 ha per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2000s	0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2010s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2020s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Namibia or New Zealand?: Namibia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Namibia and New Zealand?: 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and New Zealand?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Namibia and New Zealand rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?: Namibia ranks 95th and New Zealand ranks 97th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/new-zealand/">Namibia vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Unit: ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.