Bahamas vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

Bahamas
481.29 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand
667.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Bahamas rank
5th
New Zealand rank
4th

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Bahamas
  • New Zealand
-2000200400600800199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 667.35 % change on previous year against 481.29 % change on previous year in Bahamas, a difference of 186.06 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Bahamas ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 5.94 % change on previous year 44.19 % change on previous year 38.25 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 7.4 % change on previous year -13.86 % change on previous year 21.25 % change on previous year Bahamas
2010s 136.11 % change on previous year 66.71 % change on previous year 69.4 % change on previous year Bahamas
2020s 120.16 % change on previous year 264.51 % change on previous year 144.35 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Bahamas or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 667.35 % change on previous year against 481.29 % change on previous year in Bahamas as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Bahamas and New Zealand?
186.06 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Zealand?
27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and New Zealand rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Bahamas ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/bahamas-the/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/bahamas-the/new-zealand/">Bahamas vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.