Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

Barbados
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Barbados rank
126th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
126th

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Barbados
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
-1000100200300199120072024

How they compare

Barbados currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

Across all 7 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 126th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th of 183 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1990s -16.67 % change on previous year -7.87 % change on previous year 8.8 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s -100 % change on previous year -50.53 % change on previous year 49.47 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Barbados or China, Hong Kong SAR?
Barbados, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR?
0 % change on previous year, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR?
7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
How do Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Barbados ranks 126th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/barbados/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/barbados/china-hong-kong-sar/">Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.