Central Asia vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

Central Asia
75.41 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand
667.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Central Asia rank
2nd
New Zealand rank
4th

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Central Asia
  • New Zealand
-2000200400600800199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 667.35 % change on previous year against 75.41 % change on previous year in Central Asia, a difference of 591.94 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 8.8 times Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was New Zealand ahead.

Central Asia ranks 2nd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 29.7 % change on previous year 56.82 % change on previous year 27.12 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 83.85 % change on previous year -13.86 % change on previous year 97.71 % change on previous year Central Asia
2010s 89.45 % change on previous year 66.71 % change on previous year 22.74 % change on previous year Central Asia
2020s 129.66 % change on previous year 264.51 % change on previous year 134.85 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Central Asia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 667.35 % change on previous year against 75.41 % change on previous year in Central Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Central Asia and New Zealand?
591.94 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and New Zealand?
25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Central Asia and New Zealand rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Central Asia ranks 2nd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/central-asia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/central-asia/new-zealand/">Central Asia vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.