China, Hong Kong SAR vs Estonia: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate
China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Estonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
126th
Estonia rank
126th
Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Estonia
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Estonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Estonia ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1 % change on previous year | -18.54 % change on previous year | 17.54 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2000s | -11.94 % change on previous year | 47.14 % change on previous year | 59.08 % change on previous year | Estonia |
| 2010s | -82.49 % change on previous year | -93.64 % change on previous year | 11.15 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | -100 % change on previous year | -50.01 % change on previous year | 49.99 % change on previous year | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), China, Hong Kong SAR or Estonia?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Estonia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Estonia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Estonia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Estonia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th and Estonia ranks 126th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.