Croatia vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

Croatia
911.43 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand
667.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Croatia rank
2nd
New Zealand rank
4th

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Croatia
  • New Zealand
02505007501.0k199120072024

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 911.43 % change on previous year against 667.35 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 244.08 % change on previous year.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.4 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1993 it was New Zealand ahead.

Croatia ranks 2nd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 31.5 % change on previous year 56.82 % change on previous year 25.32 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 296.64 % change on previous year -13.86 % change on previous year 310.5 % change on previous year Croatia
2010s 218.88 % change on previous year 49.48 % change on previous year 169.4 % change on previous year Croatia
2020s 233.88 % change on previous year 264.51 % change on previous year 30.63 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Croatia or New Zealand?
Croatia, at 911.43 % change on previous year against 667.35 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Croatia and New Zealand?
244.08 % change on previous year, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and New Zealand?
23 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Croatia and New Zealand rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Croatia ranks 2nd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/croatia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/croatia/new-zealand/">Croatia vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.