Cuba vs OECD: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

Cuba
-47.12 % change on previous year
in 2024
OECD
-46.11 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cuba rank
92nd
OECD rank
91st

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Cuba
  • OECD
-1000100200300400199120072024

How they compare

OECD currently reports -46.11 % change on previous year against -47.12 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 1.01 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was OECD ahead.

Cuba ranks 92nd and OECD ranks 91st of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and OECD in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba OECD Difference Ahead
1990s -7.03 % change on previous year 13.56 % change on previous year 20.59 % change on previous year OECD
2000s 41.09 % change on previous year -3.38 % change on previous year 44.46 % change on previous year Cuba
2010s 10.16 % change on previous year 6.4 % change on previous year 3.75 % change on previous year Cuba
2020s 87.46 % change on previous year 14.97 % change on previous year 72.49 % change on previous year Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Cuba or OECD?
OECD, at -46.11 % change on previous year against -47.12 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Cuba and OECD?
1.01 % change on previous year, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and OECD?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Cuba and OECD rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Cuba ranks 92nd and OECD ranks 91st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs OECD: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/cuba/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/cuba/oecd/">Cuba vs OECD: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.