Ecuador vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

Ecuador
443.02 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand
667.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ecuador rank
7th
New Zealand rank
4th

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Zealand
02505007501.0k199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 667.35 % change on previous year against 443.02 % change on previous year in Ecuador, a difference of 224.33 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Ecuador ranks 7th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s -6.15 % change on previous year 44.19 % change on previous year 50.34 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 240.48 % change on previous year -13.86 % change on previous year 254.34 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s 97.38 % change on previous year 66.71 % change on previous year 30.67 % change on previous year Ecuador
2020s 77.6 % change on previous year 264.51 % change on previous year 186.91 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Ecuador or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 667.35 % change on previous year against 443.02 % change on previous year in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Ecuador and New Zealand?
224.33 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Zealand?
27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and New Zealand rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Ecuador ranks 7th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/ecuador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/ecuador/new-zealand/">Ecuador vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.