El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

El Salvador
-5.7 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-11.51 % change on previous year
in 2024
El Salvador rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
73rd

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600199120072024

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports -5.7 % change on previous year against -11.51 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 5.81 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

El Salvador ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 73rd of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -5.94 % change on previous year 32.76 % change on previous year 38.7 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 10.49 % change on previous year -13.78 % change on previous year 24.27 % change on previous year El Salvador
2010s 70.48 % change on previous year 2.15 % change on previous year 68.32 % change on previous year El Salvador
2020s 96 % change on previous year 10.35 % change on previous year 85.65 % change on previous year El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
El Salvador, at -5.7 % change on previous year against -11.51 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
5.81 % change on previous year, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
El Salvador ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 73rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/el-salvador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/el-salvador/zimbabwe/">El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.