Finland vs Montenegro: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

Finland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Montenegro
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Finland rank
126th
Montenegro rank
126th

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Finland
  • Montenegro
-2000200400600800199120072023

How they compare

Finland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Montenegro, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 126th and Montenegro ranks 126th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 106.6 % change on previous year -89.88 % change on previous year 196.48 % change on previous year Finland
2010s 1.35 % change on previous year 27.01 % change on previous year 25.66 % change on previous year Montenegro
2020s -100 % change on previous year -3.2 % change on previous year 96.8 % change on previous year Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Finland or Montenegro?
Finland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Montenegro as of 2022.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Finland and Montenegro?
0 % change on previous year, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Montenegro?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Finland and Montenegro rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Finland ranks 126th and Montenegro ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Montenegro: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/finland/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/finland/montenegro/">Finland vs Montenegro: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.