Iceland vs Sao Tome and Principe: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate
Iceland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Iceland rank
126th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
126th
Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time
- Iceland
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Iceland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 126th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Iceland or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Iceland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Iceland and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Iceland and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
- Iceland ranks 126th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 126th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.