Israel vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

Israel
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Israel rank
126th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
126th

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Israel
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
-2000200400600199120012011

How they compare

Israel currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Israel ranks 126th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 126th of 183 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 97.21 % change on previous year -16.67 % change on previous year 113.88 % change on previous year Israel
2010s -100 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Israel or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Israel, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2011.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Israel and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 % change on previous year, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
How do Israel and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Israel ranks 126th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/israel/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/israel/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Israel vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.