Lithuania vs Montenegro: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

Lithuania
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Montenegro
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Lithuania rank
126th
Montenegro rank
126th

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Lithuania
  • Montenegro
-2000200400600800199320082024

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Montenegro, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 126th and Montenegro ranks 126th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 101.62 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 201.62 % change on previous year Lithuania
2010s -58.6 % change on previous year 55.82 % change on previous year 114.42 % change on previous year Montenegro
2020s -6.16 % change on previous year 119.09 % change on previous year 125.24 % change on previous year Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Lithuania or Montenegro?
Lithuania, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Montenegro as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Lithuania and Montenegro?
0 % change on previous year, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Montenegro?
7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Montenegro rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Lithuania ranks 126th and Montenegro ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Montenegro: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/lithuania/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/lithuania/montenegro/">Lithuania vs Montenegro: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.