Mauritius vs Slovenia: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 2013
Slovenia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritius rank
126th
Slovenia rank
126th

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Mauritius
  • Slovenia
-1000100200300400199120072023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Slovenia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovenia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 126th and Slovenia ranks 126th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 53.27 % change on previous year -6.55 % change on previous year 59.82 % change on previous year Mauritius
2000s -100 % change on previous year -73.57 % change on previous year 26.43 % change on previous year Slovenia
2010s -100 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Mauritius or Slovenia?
Mauritius, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Slovenia as of 2013.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Mauritius and Slovenia?
0 % change on previous year, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovenia?
10 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2013.
How do Mauritius and Slovenia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Mauritius ranks 126th and Slovenia ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Slovenia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/mauritius/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/mauritius/slovenia/">Mauritius vs Slovenia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.