Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Sweden: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
126th
Sweden rank
126th
Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Sweden
How they compare
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 126th and Sweden ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Sweden?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Sweden rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 126th and Sweden ranks 126th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.