New Zealand vs Pakistan: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate

New Zealand
667.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Pakistan
942.59 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand rank
4th
Pakistan rank
1st

Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • New Zealand
  • Pakistan
02505007501.0k199120072024

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 942.59 % change on previous year against 667.35 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 275.24 % change on previous year.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.4 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Pakistan ahead.

New Zealand ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 1st of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 44.19 % change on previous year -8.15 % change on previous year 52.34 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s -13.86 % change on previous year 90.54 % change on previous year 104.4 % change on previous year Pakistan
2010s 66.71 % change on previous year 33.3 % change on previous year 33.41 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s 264.51 % change on previous year 277.03 % change on previous year 12.52 % change on previous year Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), New Zealand or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 942.59 % change on previous year against 667.35 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between New Zealand and Pakistan?
275.24 % change on previous year, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Pakistan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Pakistan rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
New Zealand ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Pakistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/new-zealand/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/new-zealand/pakistan/">New Zealand vs Pakistan: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 5,888 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.