Sweden vs Turkmenistan: Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Turkmenistan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Sweden rank
126th
Turkmenistan rank
126th
Savanna and woody savanna … Burning annual growth rate over time
- Sweden
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Sweden currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 126th and Turkmenistan ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Sweden or Turkmenistan?
- Sweden, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Sweden and Turkmenistan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Turkmenistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Sweden and Turkmenistan rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
- Sweden ranks 126th and Turkmenistan ranks 126th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.