Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern Europe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
18.64 million t
in 2024
Eastern Europe
23.15 million t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
11th
Eastern Europe rank
13th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Eastern Europe
050.0M100.0M150.0M199020072024

How they compare

Eastern Europe currently reports 23.15 million t against 18.64 million t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 4.51 million t.

That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th and Eastern Europe ranks 13th of 221 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Eastern Europe Difference Ahead
1990s 71.88 million t 12.69 million t 59.19 million t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 46.49 million t 20.28 million t 26.21 million t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 34.31 million t 22.93 million t 11.38 million t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 23.19 million t 22.54 million t 655,500 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Eastern Europe?
Eastern Europe, at 23.15 million t against 18.64 million t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Eastern Europe?
4.51 million t, with Eastern Europe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Eastern Europe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Eastern Europe rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th and Eastern Europe ranks 13th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern Europe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/eastern-europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/eastern-europe/">Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern Europe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.