Canada vs Northern America: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues

Canada
13.56 million t
in 2024
Northern America
16.69 million t
in 2024
Canada rank
14th
Northern America rank
16th

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time

  • Canada
  • Northern America
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M199020072024

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 16.69 million t against 13.56 million t in Canada, a difference of 3.13 million t.

That makes Northern America's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 14th and Northern America ranks 16th of 221 countries.

Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Northern America Difference Ahead
1990s 3.88 million t 6.38 million t 2.50 million t Northern America
2000s 4.18 million t 7.85 million t 3.68 million t Northern America
2010s 6.38 million t 9.81 million t 3.43 million t Northern America
2020s 12.73 million t 16.36 million t 3.63 million t Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues, Canada or Northern America?
Northern America, at 16.69 million t against 13.56 million t in Canada as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues between Canada and Northern America?
3.13 million t, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Northern America?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Canada and Northern America rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues?
Canada ranks 14th and Northern America ranks 16th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Northern America: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/canada/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/canada/northern-america/">Canada vs Northern America: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.