Grenada vs Latvia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Grenada
0 t
in 2024
Latvia
0 t
in 2024
Grenada rank
122nd
Latvia rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Grenada
- Latvia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Latvia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.42 t | 1,534 t | 1,530 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 12.83 t | 6,706 t | 6,693 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 12.83 t | 1,800 t | 1,787 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 71.19 t | 71.19 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues, Grenada or Latvia?
- Grenada, at 0 t against 0 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues between Grenada and Latvia?
- 0 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Latvia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Grenada ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.