Libya vs Mauritius: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Libya
0 t
in 2024
Mauritius
0 t
in 2024
Libya rank
122nd
Mauritius rank
122nd
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Libya
- Mauritius
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Mauritius, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 122nd and Mauritius ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.45 t | 96.23 t | 77.78 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0 t | 53.72 t | 53.72 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0 t | 14.98 t | 14.98 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues, Libya or Mauritius?
- Libya, at 0 t against 0 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues between Libya and Mauritius?
- 0 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Mauritius rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Libya ranks 122nd and Mauritius ranks 122nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.