Kazakhstan vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop residues … capita Burning

Kazakhstan
0.0003 t per person
in 2024
New Zealand
0.0005 t per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
90th
New Zealand rank
88th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop residues … capita Burning over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • New Zealand
00.010.020.030.04199020072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0005 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.8 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 90th and New Zealand ranks 88th of 188 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0123 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0122 t per person Kazakhstan
2000s 0.0053 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0.0052 t per person Kazakhstan
2010s 0.0015 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0012 t per person Kazakhstan
2020s 0.0033 t per person 0.0004 t per person 0.0029 t per person Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Kazakhstan or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.0005 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Kazakhstan and New Zealand?
0.0002 t per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and New Zealand?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and New Zealand rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Kazakhstan ranks 90th and New Zealand ranks 88th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-capita/kazakhstan/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-capita/kazakhstan/new-zealand/">Kazakhstan vs New Zealand: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,504 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.