Armenia vs Finland: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Armenia
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Armenia rank
109th
Finland rank
109th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Armenia
  • Finland
00.050.10.150.2199020062023

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 109th and Finland ranks 109th of 188 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Finland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.032 t per square kilometre 0.0055 t per square kilometre 0.0265 t per square kilometre Armenia
2000s 0.0329 t per square kilometre 0.0208 t per square kilometre 0.0122 t per square kilometre Armenia
2010s 0.0349 t per square kilometre 0.0079 t per square kilometre 0.027 t per square kilometre Armenia
2020s 0.0295 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0.0284 t per square kilometre Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Armenia or Finland?
Armenia, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Armenia and Finland?
0 t per square kilometre, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Finland?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Finland rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Armenia ranks 109th and Finland ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Finland: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/armenia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/armenia/finland/">Armenia vs Finland: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.