Chile vs Costa Rica: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Chile
0.435 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.5003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
61st
Costa Rica rank
58th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Costa Rica
0123199020062023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.5003 t per square kilometre against 0.435 t per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0653 t per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 61st and Costa Rica ranks 58th of 188 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1173 t per square kilometre 1.06 t per square kilometre 0.9427 t per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.0795 t per square kilometre 1.25 t per square kilometre 1.17 t per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.2478 t per square kilometre 1.72 t per square kilometre 1.48 t per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.2074 t per square kilometre 1.17 t per square kilometre 0.9663 t per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Chile or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 0.5003 t per square kilometre against 0.435 t per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Chile and Costa Rica?
0.0653 t per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Chile ranks 61st and Costa Rica ranks 58th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Costa Rica: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/chile/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/chile/costa-rica/">Chile vs Costa Rica: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.