China vs Peru: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

China
0.1449 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.1234 t per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
75th
Peru rank
78th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Peru
00.20.40.6199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.1449 t per square kilometre against 0.1234 t per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0.0215 t per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.

China ranks 75th and Peru ranks 78th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1308 t per square kilometre 0.0706 t per square kilometre 0.0602 t per square kilometre China
2000s 0.2905 t per square kilometre 0.0877 t per square kilometre 0.2028 t per square kilometre China
2010s 0.1608 t per square kilometre 0.1323 t per square kilometre 0.0285 t per square kilometre China
2020s 0.0859 t per square kilometre 0.1403 t per square kilometre 0.0543 t per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), China or Peru?
China, at 0.1449 t per square kilometre against 0.1234 t per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between China and Peru?
0.0215 t per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Peru?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Peru rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
China ranks 75th and Peru ranks 78th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Peru: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/china/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/china/peru/">China vs Peru: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.