Congo vs Malawi: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Congo
21.4 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
13.94 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
15th
Malawi rank
18th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Malawi
51015202530199020062023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 21.4 t per square kilometre against 13.94 t per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 7.46 t per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 15th and Malawi ranks 18th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 19.14 t per square kilometre 21.56 t per square kilometre 2.42 t per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 18.74 t per square kilometre 19.71 t per square kilometre 0.9696 t per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 28 t per square kilometre 18.21 t per square kilometre 9.79 t per square kilometre Congo
2020s 23.29 t per square kilometre 16.08 t per square kilometre 7.22 t per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Congo or Malawi?
Congo, at 21.4 t per square kilometre against 13.94 t per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Congo and Malawi?
7.46 t per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malawi?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Congo and Malawi rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Congo ranks 15th and Malawi ranks 18th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Malawi: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/congo-rep/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/congo-rep/malawi/">Congo vs Malawi: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.