Cuba vs Myanmar: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Cuba
7.71 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
10.19 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
22nd
Myanmar rank
21st

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Myanmar
051015199020062023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 10.19 t per square kilometre against 7.71 t per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 2.48 t per square kilometre.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.3 times Cuba's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 22nd and Myanmar ranks 21st of 188 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Myanmar Difference Ahead
1990s 2.68 t per square kilometre 7.97 t per square kilometre 5.29 t per square kilometre Myanmar
2000s 4.42 t per square kilometre 8.88 t per square kilometre 4.45 t per square kilometre Myanmar
2010s 3.15 t per square kilometre 9.06 t per square kilometre 5.91 t per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 5.71 t per square kilometre 7.92 t per square kilometre 2.21 t per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Cuba or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 10.19 t per square kilometre against 7.71 t per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Cuba and Myanmar?
2.48 t per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Myanmar?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Myanmar rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Cuba ranks 22nd and Myanmar ranks 21st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Myanmar: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/cuba/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/cuba/myanmar/">Cuba vs Myanmar: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.