Ecuador vs Italy: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Ecuador
0.2305 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy
0.1676 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
71st
Italy rank
74th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Italy
00.511.5199020062023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.2305 t per square kilometre against 0.1676 t per square kilometre in Italy, a difference of 0.0629 t per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.4 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 71st and Italy ranks 74th of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Italy Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3117 t per square kilometre 0.1066 t per square kilometre 0.2051 t per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.3759 t per square kilometre 0.1329 t per square kilometre 0.243 t per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.6119 t per square kilometre 0.1036 t per square kilometre 0.5083 t per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.7538 t per square kilometre 0.1662 t per square kilometre 0.5876 t per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Ecuador or Italy?
Ecuador, at 0.2305 t per square kilometre against 0.1676 t per square kilometre in Italy as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Ecuador and Italy?
0.0629 t per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Italy?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Italy rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Ecuador ranks 71st and Italy ranks 74th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Italy: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/ecuador/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/ecuador/italy/">Ecuador vs Italy: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.