El Salvador vs Suriname: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

El Salvador
0.2714 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.3732 t per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
65th
Suriname rank
62nd

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Suriname
01234199020062023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.3732 t per square kilometre against 0.2714 t per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.1018 t per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.4 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 65th and Suriname ranks 62nd of 188 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7857 t per square kilometre 0.1981 t per square kilometre 0.5875 t per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.6818 t per square kilometre 0.3001 t per square kilometre 0.3816 t per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 1.81 t per square kilometre 0.2582 t per square kilometre 1.55 t per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.6147 t per square kilometre 0.1565 t per square kilometre 0.4582 t per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), El Salvador or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.3732 t per square kilometre against 0.2714 t per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between El Salvador and Suriname?
0.1018 t per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Suriname?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Suriname rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
El Salvador ranks 65th and Suriname ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Suriname: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/el-salvador/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/el-salvador/suriname/">El Salvador vs Suriname: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.