Equatorial Guinea vs Romania: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.051 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0331 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
84th
Romania rank
87th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Romania
00.20.40.6199020062023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.051 t per square kilometre against 0.0331 t per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.0179 t per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 84th and Romania ranks 87th of 188 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.003 t per square kilometre 0.076 t per square kilometre 0.073 t per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0882 t per square kilometre 0.0882 t per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0 t per square kilometre 0.1831 t per square kilometre 0.1831 t per square kilometre Romania
2020s 0.0128 t per square kilometre 0.1726 t per square kilometre 0.1598 t per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Equatorial Guinea or Romania?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.051 t per square kilometre against 0.0331 t per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Equatorial Guinea and Romania?
0.0179 t per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Romania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Romania rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 84th and Romania ranks 87th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Romania: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/equatorial-guinea/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/equatorial-guinea/romania/">Equatorial Guinea vs Romania: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.