Guatemala vs Nigeria: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Guatemala
4.78 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
4.74 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
28th
Nigeria rank
30th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nigeria
01020304050199020062023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 4.78 t per square kilometre against 4.74 t per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.04 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nigeria ahead.

Guatemala ranks 28th and Nigeria ranks 30th of 188 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nigeria Difference Ahead
1990s 5.77 t per square kilometre 25.42 t per square kilometre 19.65 t per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 10.4 t per square kilometre 14.6 t per square kilometre 4.2 t per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 6.7 t per square kilometre 8.35 t per square kilometre 1.65 t per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 4.49 t per square kilometre 7.38 t per square kilometre 2.89 t per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Guatemala or Nigeria?
Guatemala, at 4.78 t per square kilometre against 4.74 t per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Guatemala and Nigeria?
0.04 t per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nigeria?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Nigeria rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Guatemala ranks 28th and Nigeria ranks 30th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Nigeria: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/guatemala/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/guatemala/nigeria/">Guatemala vs Nigeria: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.