Iceland vs Sweden: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Iceland
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
109th
Sweden rank
109th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Sweden
00.0250.050.0750.1199020062023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.

Iceland ranks 109th and Sweden ranks 109th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0034 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0024 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0129 t per square kilometre 0.0129 t per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Iceland or Sweden?
Iceland, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Iceland and Sweden?
0 t per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sweden?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Sweden rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Iceland ranks 109th and Sweden ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Sweden: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/iceland/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/iceland/sweden/">Iceland vs Sweden: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.