Isle of Man vs Norway: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Isle of Man
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Isle of Man rank
109th
Norway rank
109th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Isle of Man
  • Norway
00.010.020.030.04199020062023

How they compare

Isle of Man currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.

Isle of Man ranks 109th and Norway ranks 109th of 188 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Isle of Man Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0036 t per square kilometre 0.0034 t per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0103 t per square kilometre 0.0091 t per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Isle of Man or Norway?
Isle of Man, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Isle of Man and Norway?
0 t per square kilometre, with Isle of Man ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Norway?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Isle of Man and Norway rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Isle of Man ranks 109th and Norway ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Isle of Man vs Norway: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/isle-of-man/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/isle-of-man/norway/">Isle of Man vs Norway: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.