Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Papua New Guinea
3.3 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3.68 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
35th
Zimbabwe rank
34th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
0204060199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 3.68 t per square kilometre against 3.3 t per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.38 t per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 188 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1.7 t per square kilometre 32.24 t per square kilometre 30.54 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2.36 t per square kilometre 10.28 t per square kilometre 7.92 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 2.33 t per square kilometre 8.28 t per square kilometre 5.95 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 1.62 t per square kilometre 3.3 t per square kilometre 1.69 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 3.68 t per square kilometre against 3.3 t per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0.38 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Papua New Guinea ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.