Serbia vs Tunisia: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Serbia
0.0094 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0189 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia rank
93rd
Tunisia rank
90th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Serbia
  • Tunisia
00.250.50.7511.2199020062023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0189 t per square kilometre against 0.0094 t per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.0095 t per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 2.0 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 90th of 188 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.3345 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.334 t per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 0.1357 t per square kilometre 0.0078 t per square kilometre 0.1279 t per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 0.0725 t per square kilometre 0.0122 t per square kilometre 0.0604 t per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Serbia or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.0189 t per square kilometre against 0.0094 t per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Serbia and Tunisia?
0.0095 t per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tunisia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Tunisia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Serbia ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 90th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Tunisia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/serbia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/serbia/tunisia/">Serbia vs Tunisia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.