Argentina vs Australia: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning

Argentina
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Australia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Argentina rank
42nd
Australia rank
39th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia
00000199020072024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Argentina, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.5 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Argentina ranks 42nd and Australia ranks 39th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Australia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP Australia
2000s 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Australia
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Australia
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Argentina or Australia?
Australia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Argentina as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Argentina and Australia?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Australia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Argentina ranks 42nd and Australia ranks 39th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/australia/">Argentina vs Australia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.